BG
CS
DA
DE
EL
EN
ES
ET
FI
FR
HU
IS
IT
LT
LV
MT
NL
NO
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
SV
   
 
Click Authorities & Institutions: Standardisation, Management Board, Rulemaking, International cooperation

EWIS ICA Requirements FAQ


EWIS ICA Requirements
On which basis / requirement the Agency has requested TC holders to develop EWIS ICA?

New and revised certification specifications were introduced through CS-25 “Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplane” amendment 5 with a new Subpart H – Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems – EWIS. The new amendment has been published as part of the ED Decision No. 2008/006/R on the 29th August 2008 and enters into force on September 5th, 2008.
The requirement for existing TC holders to develop EWIS Instructions for Continued Airworthiness (ICA) derived from the Enhanced Zonal Analysis Procedure (EZAP) is imposed through the provisions of Part 21A.3B(c)1 for existing TCs, 21A.21(c)(3) for applicants for TC and 21A.103(a)(2)(iii) for applicants for changes to TC. TC holders have been notified of the applicability of those provisions through a dedicated letter that was sent in October 2008. This letter gives further details on the affected aeroplanes (see Question 4 below), deliverables and compliance dates.
Note: The Agency has used this letter in the absence of a regulatory tool similar to FAR Part 26.

On which basis / requirement the Agency is requesting a STC Applicant to evaluate if a revision to EWIS ICA is necessary?

New and revised certification specifications were introduced through CS-25 “Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplane” amendment 5 with a new Subpart H – Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems – EWIS. The new amendment has been published as part of the ED Decision No. 2008/006/R on the 29th August 2008 and enters into force on September 5th, 2008.
For STC applications received after Jan. 1st 2009, the Agency is mandating the EZAP related aspects dealing with Instructions for Continued Airworthiness of these requirements through a generic Certification Review Item with a Special Condition based on Part 21A.16B(a)3 that will be therefore part of the Certification Basis for that STC.

Potentially affected applicants have been advised through a dedicated letter that was sent in October 2008, giving further details on affected aeroplanes, deliverables and compliance dates.

Are these requirements applicable to any major design change or only to significant or substantial change where the latest requirements must be considered (according to Part 21A.101)?

For TC holders for the affected aeroplanes, EWIS ICA requirements are applicable to any changes to TC.
 
For STC applicants for the affected aeroplanes, due to the nature of the tool used (Special Conditions levied on STC applications received), applicability of EWIS ICA requirements will be limited to new STCs or major changes to STCs. This is applicable to the transition period until mid 2010 when all the TC holders EWIS ICA programmes have been established and published.

The letter dated 07.01.2009 (the letter sent by DOA Section) specifies certain aircraft class in the footer. Where can we find this specified in a current regulation?

The affected aeroplane types are indicated in the letters sent to all affected TC holders and potential STC applicants.. The affected aircraft types are large aeroplanes with a type certificate issued after 1st January 1958, that, as a result of original type certification or later increase in capacity, have -

  1. a maximum type-certificated passenger capacity of 30 or more; or
  2. a maximum payload capacity of 3402 kg (7500 pounds) or more.

Some aeroplane types are explicitly excluded from the similar FAA rule (FAR 26.11(g)). Are these types also excluded from EASA requirements?

No, EASA does not have a “pre-defined” list of excluded aeroplane types (similar to FAR 26.11(g)). On a case-by-case basis, the TC Holders for the affected aeroplanes may ask the Agency to accept a non-compliance with EWIS ICA requirements.

How can we as DOA identify if an aircraft model is applicable or otherwise has been made compliant (by means of a retroactive requirement) to this rule? Will it be entered into the TCDS or will there be an AD requiring that or does each individual DOA has to find its own way through it by going through the ICA documentation?

The Agency is considering making public (possibly through the web site) the list of aeroplane types for which EWIS ICAs have been produced. The exact form has not yet been defined. The list should be available by the end of 2009. Plan is also to have Special Condition formalised and referenced in the TCDS of the affected product.

How will the EWIS/EZAP assessment affect minor modifications and repairs for TCs/STCs and if the requirements are found to be applicable would this affect their classification (e.g. minor becomes major)?

By principle, the classification of the change is driven by Part 21A.91. The fact that EWIS ICA may be revised is not in itself a driver for the classification.
For STCs, see also question 3.
It must be noted that for FAR Part 26 compliance, the FAA will require that if the change requires a revision to the previously developed and approved EWIS ICA, then the revised EWIS-ICA must be submitted to the FCAA for approval, independently of the change classification.

We anticipate that a CRI may be needed for each STC because of the need to at least have the applicants use the checklist. Has EASA considered the effect on the hours to be allocated for each task to include the extra work? In addition may this not also affect the classification of an STC from Simple to Standard because of the need to include an electrical specialist each time?

The effect of extra work and additional hours needs to be accounted for.
Simple STCs may be subject to change from “simple” to “standard” due to an EWIS impact. Nevertheless, not all STCs affected by EWIS become automatically standard.
Classification between simple/standard will be managed according to the processes in place and the possible need to involve more than one Panel for this specific task.

To avoid the extra workload would it not be an idea to have EU DOAs include consideration of the ICA requirements as part of their procedures? This would make EWIS part of their normal practises?

Yes, this is under consideration.
For TC Holders determination of impact of modifications on EWIS ICA is left to the applicant (no systematic check for each mod.). This assumes that the appropriate DOA procedures are in place and have been checked by EASA.

Will we need to amend the TC basis for each type to include this CS-25 requirement and publish in amended TCDSs?

Yes, the plan is to use the CRI Process and Special Condition tool and make it become part of the Certification Basis.
The intent of those CRIs and the Special Condition that will be attached is to complement the letters that have been sent to the Design Approval Holders, not to replace them. Their objective is to state in an easily identifiable manner the certification basis to ease future modifications and STCs. Objective is to have that in place by end 2009. This will hopefully save the need to issue a SC for each STC after June 2010 assuming this SC is clearly identified in the cert basis/TCDS of the affected aeroplane.

The 07/06/10 deadline date for STC applicants - how will this be managed by EASA if the STC has already been issued. Will a new project be needed to allow the teams to review the ICAs?

Yes, once the CRI is concurred and it is established that the STC is affected by the new rules then the applicant has to send an additional application aimed to cover the aspects related to the EWIS Rules additional demonstration of compliance and possible revised ICAs.
The STC can be issued with a statement in the “Limitations and Conditions” section that will be cleared when final justification is produced.

If there are two or more modifications being embodied at the same time - e.g. cargo conversion - how will EASA ensure that each applicant checks the effect of their design change on the aircraft and on each others modification's?

The question is a practical one and also applicable to other aspects of certification than EWIS ICAs. EASA should point out to the applicants any concurrent application that may impact the validity of the EZAP analysis.

In case the certification basis is CS-25 Amdt 5 according to part 21A.101 (i.e. STC is a significant change related to EWIS aspects or new product), will the EWIS ICA discriminant (>30 pax or >7,500 lb) still apply?

No, if the certification basis is the CS-25 Amdt 5, all the large aeroplanes covered by CS-25 shall have to demonstrate compliance with the EWIS regulations without exception.

Would EASA recommend to STC applicants to elect to comply with CS-25 Amdt 5 on a voluntary basis?

From a safety perspective this would be welcomed but from a practical point of view it may not be the best option when this is not required by Part 21. By electing to comply with CS-25 Amdt 5 all new requirements have to be complied with, which are not limited to EWIS ICA. Due to the nature of the new subpart H, this will induce additional justifications and possibly design changes and will affect the time needed to approve a project.



Disclaimer & Copyright Notice 2003 - 2010 easa.europa.eu